Autism May be Caused by Everyday Chemicals
By Ina Woolcott
Unborn babies in the womb and breastfed children exposed to an everyday
variety of chemicals may be at a greater risk of development disorders such
as autism, scientists claim. They have discovered that a group of PCB
(polychlorinated biphenyl) compounds, previously regarded as harmless, may
in fact damage the sound processing part of the brain. Children who have
developmental disorders, such as autism and language impairments, have an
auditory cortex responding abnormally to sound. There are some scientists
who reckon this is the basis of the disorders.
PCBs gathered popularity as fire retardants and in home and office furniture
and electronics as they tend to burn slowly. In 1977 they were banned as
some types of PCB - not the ones in the recent study - were proven to pose a
serious health risk. The compounds persist in the environment, exist widely
in the food chain entering our bodies and are also present in dust. It is
also possible to pass them onto babies in the womb or when breastfeeding.
On the online Early Edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences in the USA, a study focused on abnormalities in rat babies whose
mums were exposed to the toxic chemical in their diet during pregnancy and
the early weeks of breastfeeding. The rat babies had a decreased ability to
react to sound, as the chemical altered the part of the brain related to
this. The levels of the chemicals in their blood on an equivalent scale was
roughly that of the levels in the blood of human babies who were breastfed
by mums exposed to high levels of the chemical from contaminated, high-risk
environments.
The scientists who conducted the study, emphasised that their findings did
not demonstrate that the toxicant causes developmental disorders, but are
worried about the prevalence of this class of PCB - known as non-coplanar
PCB's - in the atmosphere and environment, and the lack of studies into it.
The head of research, Dr Tal Kenet, who worked with Dr Michael Merzenich at
the Keck Centre for Integrative Neuroscience at the University of California
stated - 'there are chemicals out there, this being just one example, that
could profoundly effect development'.
' This is a red Flag. The impact of this class of chemicals, whose toxicity
has been under appreciated, must be studied in human populations - and fast.
We know that some environmental risk applies on the early developmental
history of the brain in the foetus and baby.People have struggled with what
kind of factors these might be. I think environmental poisons, including the
chemicals we've examined in this study are very good candidates,' Dr
Merzenich said.
The team was not advising women to quit breastfeeding, Dr Kenet said. 'The
finding does suggest the need for studies in human populations to determine
whether there are possible risks associated with breastfeeding in cases of
extreme exposure to this class of chemicals, in particular in infants who
may have a genetic predisposition to developmental disorders based on their
family history'
Editors comments:
Personally, I hope this study doesn't put women off breastfeeding. Or that
they use it as an excuse not to breastfeed. We just need to clue ourselves
up on this topic and not use/avoid chemicals wherever and whenever possible
- whether they are considered safe or not! Breast milk is still superior.
And those poor rats whom were tested - people can say a hundred times that
they were bred for the sole purpose of testing but they still have feelings!